lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 22 Jun 2016 11:34:32 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	gnurou@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] regulator: core: Allow simultaneous use of enable op
 and GPIO

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 05:25:53PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> The current regulator enable/disable mechanism does not call the driver
> enable/disable op if an enable GPIO is set. It may be desirable to use
> both mechanisms though, e.g. in the case of a PWM regulator that also
> has an enable GPIO.
> 
> _regulator_is_enabled() is also updated in order to take both enable
> conditions into account.

This is going to break or at least reduce the performance of a lot of
users - it is very common for regulators to have configurable support
for a GPIO enable in addition to a register enable with the GPIO enable
replacing a register enable for improved performance.  If you have some
strange device that requires GPIO and other operations the driver should
handle that, if nothing else it's likely that there are sequencing
requirements between the two which we are probably not going to get
right for everyone in the core.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ