lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:56:33 +0530
From:	Keerthy <a0393675@...com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:	Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, <tony@...mide.com>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <t-kristo@...com>,
	<russ.dill@...com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
	<linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] regulator: tps65217: Enable suspend configuration



On Wednesday 22 June 2016 03:46 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 03:44:02PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>
>> Hence saving it in a static array and using it later in the ops functions to
>> disable or enable regulator during suspend.
>
> Why a static array and not part of the dynamically allocated driver
> data?

Okay. That can be done.
I can introduce another integer pointer to struct tps65217 which 
currently holds the driver data.

I will allocate memory for TPS65217_NUM_REGULATOR strobes during 
regulator probe. Is this approach okay?

>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ