lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 22 Jun 2016 16:31:12 +0200
From:	Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To:	Mario_Limonciello@...l.com
Cc:	gabriele.mzt@...il.com, mjg59@...f.ucam.org, dvhart@...radead.org,
	kernel@...pniu.pl, luto@...nel.org, alex.hung@...onical.com,
	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dell-wmi: Add information about other WMI event codes

On Wednesday 22 June 2016 14:28:37 Mario_Limonciello@...l.com wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pali Rohár [mailto:pali.rohar@...il.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 9:24 AM
> > To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario_Limonciello@...l.com>
> > Cc: gabriele.mzt@...il.com; mjg59@...f.ucam.org; dvhart@...radead.org;
> > kernel@...pniu.pl; luto@...nel.org; alex.hung@...onical.com; platform-
> > driver-x86@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dell-wmi: Add information about other WMI event
> > codes
> > 
> > On Wednesday 22 June 2016 14:21:25 Mario_Limonciello@...l.com wrote:
> > > > > For Linux I don’t think this is necessary and a NOOP is appropriate.
> > > > >
> > > > > There is also a second place that some older laptops had a battery
> > "hotkey"
> > > > > that would also emit 0xE00E.  This was also picked up by quickset and
> > would
> > > > > show battery information.
> > > > >
> > > > > This shouldn't be blocked by kernel, I'd expect if someone wants to
> > bind
> > > > this
> > > > > to another application from userspace they should be able to.
> > > >
> > > > Great! Can I send patch after which 0xe00e will be send to input layer as
> > > > event KEY_BATTERY?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Well that's why I was mentioning this in two places.  If it's received from
> > keyboard
> > > recoding it as KEY_BATTERY sounds appropriate to me.  If it's received from
> > WMI,
> > > it really shouldn't be set as anything for Linux to do.
> > >
> > > I don't think any apps will benefit from the notification to re-read battery
> > > Information today.
> > 
> > I mean for dell-wmi.c code.
> > Why it should not be set to anything on Linux?
> > 
> 
> On Windows Quickset is a separate application from built-in Windows battery 
> applet.  It shows similar types of information as gnome-power-manager does, 
> but because it's not part of the OS, it doesn't get notifications like this so 
> special BIOS hooks are in place for it to know when to re-read battery
> information.
> 
> On Linux, there are already infrastructure for battery removal and adding 
> notifications from ACPI.  Sending this up to user space won't be useful.

Errr. I mean WMI event 0xe00e which you wrote is emitted when user press
battery key. And I think this event should be sent by dell-wmi.c as
KEY_BATTERY.

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ