linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Jun 2016 11:40:14 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	<intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Lyude <cpaul@...hat.com>, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
	Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@...el.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the
 drm-intel-fixes tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c

between commit:

  1e3fa0acfec6 ("drm/i915/fbc: Disable on HSW by default for now")

from the drm-intel-fixes tree and commit:

  80788a0fbbdf ("drm/i915/fbc: sanitize i915.enable_fbc during FBC init")

from the drm-intel tree.

I fixed it up (since the former patch appears on both trees, I just
used the latter) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed
as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should
be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell