linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Jun 2016 16:40:39 -0400
From:	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21

On 6/22/2016 5:16 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 02:36:34PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
>> >On 6/21/2016 2:28 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> > >On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 07:29:18PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> > >
>>>>> > >>>OK, I seem to have a tilepro-linux-gcc-6.1.1 build done. Lets see if I
>>>>> > >>>can build me a kernel with it.
>>> > >The below, much larger than desired, patch seems to make it go again.
>>> > >
>>> > >I had to s/__atomic_fetch/__atomic32_fetch/ to avoid a namespace clash
>>> > >with the builtin C11 atomic primitives.
>>> > >
>>> > >You want me to rename them all to regain consistent naming?
>> >
>> >Yes, it's probably the right thing to do.  All the internal routines with "atomic32"
>> >or "atomic64" I assume you mean?
> Something like so then?
>
> ---
>   arch/tile/include/asm/atomic_32.h |   24 ++++++++++++------------
>   arch/tile/include/asm/futex.h     |   14 +++++++-------
>   arch/tile/lib/atomic_32.c         |   16 ++++++++--------
>   arch/tile/lib/atomic_asm_32.S     |   21 +++++++++++++--------
>   4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

Yes, that looks good.  Thanks!

Acked-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>

-- 
Chris Metcalf, Mellanox Technologies
http://www.mellanox.com