lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 24 Jun 2016 01:33:02 +0900
From:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Calvin Owens <calvinowens@...com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] printk: introduce should_ignore_loglevel()

Due to deferred printing, console log level is inspected when the actual
printing occurs, which may provoke console_unlock() and console_cont_flush()
to waste CPU cycles on every message that has loglevel above the current
console_loglevel.

Schematically, console_unlock() does the following:

console_unlock()
{
	...
	for (;;) {
		...
		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&logbuf_lock, flags);
skip:
		msg = log_from_idx(console_idx);

		if (msg->flags & LOG_NOCONS) {
			...
			goto skip;
		}

		level = msg->level;
		len += msg_print_text();			>> sprintfs
								   memcpy,
								   etc.

		if (nr_ext_console_drivers) {
			ext_len = msg_print_ext_header();	>> scnprintf
			ext_len += msg_print_ext_body();	>> scnprintfs
								   etc.
		}
		...
		raw_spin_unlock(&logbuf_lock);

		call_console_drivers(level, ext_text, ext_len, text, len)
		{
			if (level >= console_loglevel &&	>> drop the message
					!ignore_loglevel)
				return;

			console->write(...);
		}

		local_irq_restore(flags);
	}
	...
}

The thing here is this deferred `level >= console_loglevel' check. We are
wasting CPU cycles on sprintfs/memcpy/etc. preparing the messages that we
will eventually drop.

This can be huge when we register a new CON_PRINTBUFFER console, for
instance. For every such a console register_console() resets the
	console_seq, console_idx, console_prev
and sets a `exclusive console' pointer to replay the log buffer to that
just-registered console. And there can be a lot of messages to replay, in
the worst case most of which can be dropped after console_loglevel test.


We know messages' levels long before we call msg_print_text() and friends,
so we can just move console_loglevel check out of call_console_drivers()
and format a new message only if we are sure that it won't be dropped.

The patch factors out loglevel check into should_ignore_loglevel() function
and tests message->level and console_loglevel before formatting functions
in console_unlock() and console_cont_flush() are getting executed.

This improves things not only for exclusive CON_PRINTBUFFER consoles,
but for every console_unlock() that attempts to print a message of level
above the console_loglevel.

Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
---
 kernel/printk/printk.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index 414a89f..bfb766b 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -987,6 +987,11 @@ module_param(ignore_loglevel, bool, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(ignore_loglevel,
 		 "ignore loglevel setting (prints all kernel messages to the console)");
 
+static bool should_ignore_loglevel(int level)
+{
+	return (level >= console_loglevel && !ignore_loglevel);
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_BOOT_PRINTK_DELAY
 
 static int boot_delay; /* msecs delay after each printk during bootup */
@@ -1016,7 +1021,7 @@ static void boot_delay_msec(int level)
 	unsigned long timeout;
 
 	if ((boot_delay == 0 || system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING)
-		|| (level >= console_loglevel && !ignore_loglevel)) {
+		|| should_ignore_loglevel(level)) {
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1506,8 +1511,6 @@ static void call_console_drivers(int level,
 
 	trace_console(text, len);
 
-	if (level >= console_loglevel && !ignore_loglevel)
-		return;
 	if (!console_drivers)
 		return;
 
@@ -1955,6 +1958,7 @@ static void call_console_drivers(int level,
 static size_t msg_print_text(const struct printk_log *msg, enum log_flags prev,
 			     bool syslog, char *buf, size_t size) { return 0; }
 static size_t cont_print_text(char *text, size_t size) { return 0; }
+static bool should_ignore_loglevel(int level) { return false; }
 
 /* Still needs to be defined for users */
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(printk_func_t, printk_func);
@@ -2234,6 +2238,13 @@ static void console_cont_flush(char *text, size_t size)
 	if (!cont.len)
 		goto out;
 
+	if (should_ignore_loglevel(cont.level)) {
+		cont.cons = cont.len;
+		if (cont.flushed)
+			cont.len = 0;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * We still queue earlier records, likely because the console was
 	 * busy. The earlier ones need to be printed before this one, we
@@ -2337,10 +2348,13 @@ skip:
 			break;
 
 		msg = log_from_idx(console_idx);
-		if (msg->flags & LOG_NOCONS) {
+		level = msg->level;
+		if ((msg->flags & LOG_NOCONS) ||
+				should_ignore_loglevel(level)) {
 			/*
 			 * Skip record we have buffered and already printed
-			 * directly to the console when we received it.
+			 * directly to the console when we received it, and
+			 * record that has level above the console loglevel.
 			 */
 			console_idx = log_next(console_idx);
 			console_seq++;
@@ -2354,7 +2368,6 @@ skip:
 			goto skip;
 		}
 
-		level = msg->level;
 		len += msg_print_text(msg, console_prev, false,
 				      text + len, sizeof(text) - len);
 		if (nr_ext_console_drivers) {
-- 
2.9.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ