lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:59:14 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	<intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the sunxi tree with the drm-misc tree

Hi Maxime,

Today's linux-next merge of the sunxi tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_drv.c

between commit:

  366e292df678 ("drm/sun4i: Remove open-coded drm_connector_register_all()")

from the drm-misc tree and commit:

  7aa2e2b731b3 ("drm/sun4i: Convert to connector register helpers")

from the sunxi tree.

I fixed it up (I just removed the drm_connector_register_all call as
in the former) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as
far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be
mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Powered by blists - more mailing lists