lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:19:35 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	js1304@...il.com
Cc:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] reduce memory usage by page_owner

On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:57:30 +0900 js1304@...il.com wrote:

> There was a bug reported by Sasha and minor fixes is needed
> so I send v3.
> 
> o fix a bg reported by Sasha (mm/compaction: split freepages
> without holding the zone lock)
> o add code comment for todo list (mm/page_owner: use stackdepot
> to store stacktrace) per Michal
> o add 'inline' keyword (mm/page_alloc: introduce post allocation
> processing on page allocator) per Vlastimil
> o add a patch that clean-up code per Vlastimil

I've gone through v3 patches 2-9 and have plucked out the deltas to
take what-i-had and turn that into what-you-sent.  Patch 1/9 has seen a
lot of competing churn in isolate_freepages_block(), so please review
the current version of that, below.  Between the "===" markers:


static unsigned long isolate_freepages_block(struct compact_control *cc,
				unsigned long *start_pfn,
				unsigned long end_pfn,
				struct list_head *freelist,
				bool strict)
{
	int nr_scanned = 0, total_isolated = 0;
	struct page *cursor, *valid_page = NULL;
	unsigned long flags = 0;
	bool locked = false;
	unsigned long blockpfn = *start_pfn;
	unsigned int order;

	cursor = pfn_to_page(blockpfn);

	/* Isolate free pages. */
	for (; blockpfn < end_pfn; blockpfn++, cursor++) {
		int isolated;
		struct page *page = cursor;

		/*
		 * Periodically drop the lock (if held) regardless of its
		 * contention, to give chance to IRQs. Abort if fatal signal
		 * pending or async compaction detects need_resched()
		 */
		if (!(blockpfn % SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)
		    && compact_unlock_should_abort(&cc->zone->lock, flags,
								&locked, cc))
			break;

		nr_scanned++;
		if (!pfn_valid_within(blockpfn))
			goto isolate_fail;

		if (!valid_page)
			valid_page = page;

		/*
		 * For compound pages such as THP and hugetlbfs, we can save
		 * potentially a lot of iterations if we skip them at once.
		 * The check is racy, but we can consider only valid values
		 * and the only danger is skipping too much.
		 */
		if (PageCompound(page)) {
			unsigned int comp_order = compound_order(page);

			if (likely(comp_order < MAX_ORDER)) {
				blockpfn += (1UL << comp_order) - 1;
				cursor += (1UL << comp_order) - 1;
			}

			goto isolate_fail;
		}

		if (!PageBuddy(page))
			goto isolate_fail;

====================
		/*
		 * If we already hold the lock, we can skip some rechecking.
		 * Note that if we hold the lock now, checked_pageblock was
		 * already set in some previous iteration (or strict is true),
		 * so it is correct to skip the suitable migration target
		 * recheck as well.
		 */
		if (!locked) {
			/*
			 * The zone lock must be held to isolate freepages.
			 * Unfortunately this is a very coarse lock and can be
			 * heavily contended if there are parallel allocations
			 * or parallel compactions. For async compaction do not
			 * spin on the lock and we acquire the lock as late as
			 * possible.
			 */
			locked = compact_trylock_irqsave(&cc->zone->lock,
								&flags, cc);
			if (!locked)
				break;

			/* Recheck this is a buddy page under lock */
			if (!PageBuddy(page))
				goto isolate_fail;
		}

		/* Found a free page, will break it into order-0 pages */
		order = page_order(page);
		isolated = __isolate_free_page(page, order);
		if (!isolated)
			break;
		set_page_private(page, order);

		total_isolated += isolated;
		cc->nr_freepages += isolated;
		list_add_tail(&page->lru, freelist);

		if (!strict && cc->nr_migratepages <= cc->nr_freepages) {
			blockpfn += isolated;
			break;
		}
		/* Advance to the end of split page */
		blockpfn += isolated - 1;
		cursor += isolated - 1;
		continue;

isolate_fail:
=====================
		if (strict)
			break;
		else
			continue;

	}

	if (locked)
		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cc->zone->lock, flags);

	/*
	 * There is a tiny chance that we have read bogus compound_order(),
	 * so be careful to not go outside of the pageblock.
	 */
	if (unlikely(blockpfn > end_pfn))
		blockpfn = end_pfn;

	trace_mm_compaction_isolate_freepages(*start_pfn, blockpfn,
					nr_scanned, total_isolated);

	/* Record how far we have got within the block */
	*start_pfn = blockpfn;

	/*
	 * If strict isolation is requested by CMA then check that all the
	 * pages requested were isolated. If there were any failures, 0 is
	 * returned and CMA will fail.
	 */
	if (strict && blockpfn < end_pfn)
		total_isolated = 0;

	/* Update the pageblock-skip if the whole pageblock was scanned */
	if (blockpfn == end_pfn)
		update_pageblock_skip(cc, valid_page, total_isolated, false);

	count_compact_events(COMPACTFREE_SCANNED, nr_scanned);
	if (total_isolated)
		count_compact_events(COMPACTISOLATED, total_isolated);
	return total_isolated;
}


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ