linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] clk: Show CRITICAL clks in clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 30 Jun 2016 16:13:53 -0400
From:	Rhyland Klein <rklein@...dia.com>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
CC:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] clk: Show CRITICAL clks in clk_summary output

On 6/28/2016 1:40 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 06/22, Rhyland Klein wrote:
>> On 6/22/2016 8:24 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>>
>>> Maybe output " " instead of "" for CLK_IS_CRITICAL, that way you can
>>> omit the second conditional.
>>>
>>> I wonder if it might be easier to read if this flag was at the end of
>>> the line. There's also the fact that someone may have written a script
>>> that expects the clock name as the first word on the line and may get
>>> confused by this change. If you put it at the very end of the line the
>>> likelihood of upsetting scripts will be reduced.
>>
>> Yah we can put the mark at the end of the line. I wasn't sure if there
>> was a strong motivation to avoid extending the the width of each line,
>> as sometimes people prefer to try to keep it close to 80 char as
>> possible. I think right now, it was close to that, but might be a little
>> over already. I can switch to that though, as it is less likely to break
>> any automatic parsing scripts.
>>
> 
> Nak. clk_summary is about taking a snapshot of the system state
> for things that may be changing rapidly, like consumers (which
> sounds fun to add!), rates, enable/prepare state. Flags are not
> changing. If you want to add flag info into some summary then a
> script should be able to augment clk_summary info (really should
> use the clk_dump in this case though) with whatever flags can be
> read through debugfs already.
> 

That is fine with me. This was more of something I was using locally to
verify things and thought it might be useful in some manner upstream.
However, a script which read the clk_flags from debugfs for each clk
could do the same thing without changing the summary.

-rhyland

-- 
nvpublic