lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 5 Jul 2016 10:12:32 +0200
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Garlic Tseng <garlic.tseng@...iatek.com>
Cc:	tiwai@...e.de, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, koro.chen@...iatek.com,
	PC.Liao@...iatek.com, ir.lian@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 3/4] ASoC: mediatek: add BT implementation

On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 09:52:13AM +0800, Garlic Tseng wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 16:44 +0200, Mark Brown wrote:

> > We really shouldn't be writing the registers or other internal data of
> > the device.  Instead we should be getting the driver for the relevant
> > hardware component to do it.  If we just write to registers that makes
> > the interoperation with the real driver for the device more fragile than
> > it should be, people might update the main driver without noticing the
> > external driver.

> The AUDIO_TOP_CON4 is a reg of the ASoC hw module. All the registers
> which are set in the btmrg operator belong to ASoC hardware. The reg
> writing you mention above is to power up the MRG interface in the ASoC
> module.

The problem is that this is the machine driver, not a driver for the
chip that's being controlled.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ