linux-kernel - Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Jul 2016 10:32:12 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
Cc:	Quinn Tran <quinn.tran@...gic.com>,
	Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Quinn Tran <quinn.tran@...gic.com> wrote:
>>
>> -       if (rsp->msix->cpuid != smp_processor_id()) {
>> +       if (rsp->msix && (rsp->msix->cpuid != smp_processor_id())) {
>
> Did this wind up going into an official commit somewhere?

It's not in my tree, at least.

And I don't think I've seen a "yes, that fixes it". Although Johannes
was right that in addition to that, the ordering of the irq setup
should probably _also_ be fixed, but that's a separate patch.

                Linus