lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 6 Jul 2016 06:01:38 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>,
	Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
	Peter Hornyack <peterhornyack@...gle.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86, kvm: use kvmclock to compute TSC deadline value

On Jul 5, 2016 1:36 PM, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Bad things happen if a guest using the TSC deadline timer is migrated.
> The guest doesn't re-calibrate the TSC after migration, and the
> TSC frequency can and will change unless your processor supports TSC
> scaling (on Intel this is only Skylake) or your data center is perfectly
> homogeneous.
>
> The solution in this patch is to skip tsc_khz, and instead derive the
> frequency from kvmclock's (mult, shift) pair.  Because kvmclock
> parameters convert from tsc to nanoseconds, this needs a division
> but that's the least of our problems when the TSC_DEADLINE_MSR write
> costs 2000 clock cycles.  Luckily tsc_khz is really used by very little
> outside the tsc clocksource (which kvmclock replaces) and the TSC
> deadline timer.

I'm wondering if it would be more straightforward to blacklist the
APIC timer entirely (on KVM guests that have the TSC deadline
capability) and to instead offer a paravirt clockevent that still uses
the deadline timer under the hood.  After all, these systems should be
mostly quirk-free, so I imagine that the whole implementation would
only be a few lines of code.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ