linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] drivers: reset: Add STM32 reset driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 Jul 2016 17:39:54 +0200
From:	Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...com>
To:	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
CC:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, <patrice.chotard@...com>,
	<alexandre.torgue@...com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] drivers: reset: Add STM32 reset driver

Hi Philipp

On 07/05/2016 03:29 PM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 05.07.2016, 09:29 +0200 schrieb Gabriel Fernandez:
> [...]
>>>> +static const struct reset_control_ops stm32_reset_ops = {
>>>> +	.assert		= stm32_reset_assert,
>>>> +	.deassert	= stm32_reset_deassert,
>>> Are the registers not readable, or did you choose not to
>>> implement .status on purpose?
>> We choose to not implement.
> Ok. Because of size issues or just because you don't need them in any of
> your drivers?
Because i don't need them.

BR

Gabriel

>
> regards
> Philipp
>