lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 7 Jul 2016 09:58:50 +0800
From:	Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
	Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
	Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@...el.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: nVMX: Fix incorrect preemption timer vmexit in
 nested guest

2016-07-07 1:11 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>:
>
>
> On 06/07/2016 18:03, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
>>>> This patch also fixed the crash of L1 Xen with L2 HVM guest. Xen does
>>>> not enable preemption timer for HVM guests, and will get panic if it
>>>> receives a preemption timer vmexit.
>>>
>>> Thanks!  I'm still not sure why the bit is set in the vmcs02 though...
>>
>> Yes, it looks really weird.
>>
>> I replaced "return false" in Wanpeng's patch by
>>
>>     pr_info("VMCS: preemption timer enabled = %d\n",
>>             !!(vmcs_read32(PIN_BASED_VM_EXEC_CONTROL) & PIN_BASED_VMX_PREEMPTION_TIMER));
>>
>> and redid my test. As expected, L1 Xen crashed due to the unexpected
>> preemption timer vmexit. I got a log from above statement just before crash:
>>
>>     VMCS: preemption timer enabled = 1
>>
>> which is expected to be 0, because preemption timer is disabled in
>> vmcs02. I also modified L1 Xen to dump VMCS at crash, and it says
>> preemption timer is disabled.
>>
>> I noticed Jim Mattson recently sent a patch "KVM: nVMX: Fix memory
>> corruption when using VMCS shadowing" to fix the inconsistency between
>> vmcs12 and its shadow. Is it relevant here? I'll test his patch
>> tomorrow.
>
> No, it shouldn't have any effect.
>
> I think it happens when the post_block hook switches back from sw_timer
> to hv_timer, and L2 is running.  So the right fix should be along the
> lines of what I posted earlier.  If you don't beat me to it, I'll take
> another look tomorrow.

I think I just figure out the root cause, I will send out a patch to fix it.

Regards,
Wanpeng Li

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ