[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 06:14:45 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>,
backports@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yann.morin.1998@...e.fr, mmarek@...e.cz, sassmann@...nic.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/21] backports: move legacy and SmPL patch
application into helper
On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 02:10 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 11:33:03AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 00:14 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
> > >
> > > This allows us to extend how backports uses patches for
> > > different types of applications. This will later be used
> > > for kernel integration support, for example.
> > >
> > > This should have no functional change.
> >
> > Obviously this patch was applied a long time ago,
>
> Geesh yes over 2 year ago.
:)
> > but you lied - it has a functional change:
> >
> > > + if process.returncode != 0:
> > > + if not args.verbose:
> > > + logwrite("Failed to apply changes from %s" %
> > > print_name)
> > > + for line in output:
> > > + logwrite('> %s' % line)
> > > + raise Exception('Patch failed')
> >
> > vs.
> >
> > > - if process.returncode != 0:
> > > - if not args.verbose:
> > > - logwrite("Failed to apply changes from %s" %
> > > print_name)
> > > - for line in output:
> > > - logwrite('> %s' % line)
> > > - return 2
> >
> > This had a major impact on the devel/git-tracker.py tool.
>
> Sorry about that, is there an easy fix for it? Is there a test
> we can do to avoid further regressions against the tracker ?
>
Luca has a fix.
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists