[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 11:12:41 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] ocfs2: silence an integer overflow warning
My static checker complains that ->me_start + ->me_len can overflow.
I haven't followed it through to see the implications but it seems
simple enough to prevent the overflow.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
---
move_extents in other less common file systems have this same warning as
well.
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c b/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c
index e3d05d9..9ff405a 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c
@@ -1014,7 +1014,8 @@ int ocfs2_ioctl_move_extents(struct file *filp, void __user *argp)
goto out_free;
}
- if (range.me_start > i_size_read(inode)) {
+ if (range.me_start > i_size_read(inode) ||
+ range.me_len > i_size_read(inode)) {
status = -EINVAL;
goto out_free;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists