[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 14:37:39 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xenbus: prefer list_for_each()
On 07/07/16 09:33, Jan Beulich wrote:
> ... over list_for_each_safe() when list modification if accompanied by
> breaking out of the loop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
> ---
> drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- 4.7-rc6-xen.orig/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c
> +++ 4.7-rc6-xen/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c
> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ out:
>
> static int xenbus_write_watch(unsigned msg_type, struct xenbus_file_priv *u)
> {
> - struct watch_adapter *watch, *tmp_watch;
> + struct watch_adapter *watch;
> char *path, *token;
> int err, rc;
> LIST_HEAD(staging_q);
> @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static int xenbus_write_watch(unsigned m
> }
> list_add(&watch->list, &u->watches);
> } else {
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(watch, tmp_watch, &u->watches, list) {
> + list_for_each_entry(watch, &u->watches, list) {
> if (!strcmp(watch->token, token) &&
> !strcmp(watch->watch.node, path)) {
> unregister_xenbus_watch(&watch->watch);
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists