[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 08:36:38 -0700
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, steve.muckle@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] cpufreq: Sorted policy->freq_table
On 27-06-16, 09:59, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> This series is aimed to make traversing of cpufreq table more efficient
> for platforms that already sort the frequency tables. The cpufreq core
> now checks if the freq table is sorted and applies a different set of
> helpers on such tables while traversing them.
>
> All the patches are pushed here for testing in case anyone wants to try:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm.git cpufreq/sorted-freq-table
>
> V4->V4:
> - s/cpufreq_table_find_index_unsorted/cpufreq_table_index_unsorted
> - return error for duplicate frequencies
> - freq-table-sorted is an enum now
> - Remove freq_is_invalid() and clamp the frequencies at the top of few
> helpers.
> - Remove few checks which were impossible to hit (best == -1)
Thanks Rafael for applying this series.
@Steve: I think you are unblocked now (sorry for the long delay) to get your
work going.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists