| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 10:26:27 +0800
From: Yakir Yang <ykk@...k-chips.com>
To: Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
Cc: Mark Yao <yzq@...k-chips.com>, Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@...omium.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: add the PSR function
support
Sean,
Thanks for your review.
On 07/02/2016 03:46 AM, Sean Paul wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 5:19 AM, Yakir Yang <ykk@...k-chips.com> wrote:
>> The full name of PSR is Panel Self Refresh, panel device could refresh
>> itself with the hardware framebuffer in panel, this would make lots of
>> sense to save the power consumption.
>>
>> This patch have exported two symbols for platform driver to implement
>> the PSR function in hardware side:
>> - analogix_dp_active_psr()
>> - analogix_dp_inactive_psr()
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang <ykk@...k-chips.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v3:
>> - split analogix_dp_enable_psr(), make it more clearly
>> analogix_dp_detect_sink_psr()
>> analogix_dp_enable_sink_psr()
>> - remove some nosie register setting comments
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - introduce in v2, splite the common Analogix DP changes out
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h | 4 ++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.h | 28 ++++++++++
>> include/drm/bridge/analogix_dp.h | 3 +
>> 5 files changed, 153 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
>> index 32715da..b557097 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
>> @@ -97,6 +97,66 @@ static int analogix_dp_detect_hpd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +int analogix_dp_active_psr(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct analogix_dp_device *dp = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +
>> + if (!dp->psr_support)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE |
>> + EDP_VSC_PSR_CRC_VALUES_VALID);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_active_psr);
>> +
>> +int analogix_dp_inactive_psr(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct analogix_dp_device *dp = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +
>> + if (!dp->psr_support)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, 0);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_inactive_psr);
>> +
>> +static bool analogix_dp_detect_sink_psr(struct analogix_dp_device *dp)
>> +{
>> + unsigned char psr_version;
>> +
>> + analogix_dp_read_byte_from_dpcd(dp, DP_PSR_SUPPORT, &psr_version);
>> + dev_info(dp->dev, "Panel PSR version : %x\n", psr_version);
>> +
> This info message is likely to be spammy since it's printed everytime
> the panel toggle on. Perhaps downgrade to debug level.
Okay, done.
>> + return (psr_version & DP_PSR_IS_SUPPORTED) ? true : false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int analogix_dp_enable_sink_psr(struct analogix_dp_device *dp)
> Return type is int, but the function never fails and you don't check
> the return value when calling it. Seems like this should be void.
Done.
>> +{
>> + unsigned char psr_en;
>> +
>> + /* Disable psr function */
>> + analogix_dp_read_byte_from_dpcd(dp, DP_PSR_EN_CFG, &psr_en);
>> + psr_en &= ~DP_PSR_ENABLE;
>> + analogix_dp_write_byte_to_dpcd(dp, DP_PSR_EN_CFG, psr_en);
>> +
>> + /* Main-Link transmitter remains active during PSR active states */
>> + analogix_dp_read_byte_from_dpcd(dp, DP_PSR_EN_CFG, &psr_en);
>> + psr_en = DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE | DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION;
> Why read psr_en if you're just going to overwrite it? Perhaps you meant |= here.
>
Yes, it's my mistaken, no need to read the DP_PSR_EN_CFG, just configure
it directly is enough.
>> + analogix_dp_write_byte_to_dpcd(dp, DP_PSR_EN_CFG, psr_en);
>> +
>> + /* Enable psr function */
>> + analogix_dp_read_byte_from_dpcd(dp, DP_PSR_EN_CFG, &psr_en);
>> + psr_en = DP_PSR_ENABLE | DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE |
>> + DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION;
> Again, no need to read if you're just overwriting.
Yes, ditto
>> + analogix_dp_write_byte_to_dpcd(dp, DP_PSR_EN_CFG, psr_en);
>> +
>> + analogix_dp_enable_psr_crc(dp);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static unsigned char analogix_dp_calc_edid_check_sum(unsigned char *edid_data)
>> {
>> int i;
>> @@ -921,6 +981,10 @@ static void analogix_dp_commit(struct analogix_dp_device *dp)
>>
>> /* Enable video */
>> analogix_dp_start_video(dp);
>> +
>> + dp->psr_support = analogix_dp_detect_sink_psr(dp);
>> + if (dp->psr_support)
>> + analogix_dp_enable_sink_psr(dp);
>> }
>>
>> int analogix_dp_get_modes(struct drm_connector *connector)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h
>> index b456380..6ca5dde 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h
>> @@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ struct analogix_dp_device {
>> int hpd_gpio;
>> bool force_hpd;
>> unsigned char edid[EDID_BLOCK_LENGTH * 2];
>> + bool psr_support;
>>
>> struct analogix_dp_plat_data *plat_data;
>> };
>> @@ -278,4 +279,7 @@ int analogix_dp_is_video_stream_on(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
>> void analogix_dp_config_video_slave_mode(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
>> void analogix_dp_enable_scrambling(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
>> void analogix_dp_disable_scrambling(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
>> +void analogix_dp_enable_psr_crc(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
>> +void analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp, int db1);
>> +
>> #endif /* _ANALOGIX_DP_CORE_H */
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
>> index 48030f0..e8372c7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
>> @@ -1322,3 +1322,57 @@ void analogix_dp_disable_scrambling(struct analogix_dp_device *dp)
>> reg |= SCRAMBLING_DISABLE;
>> writel(reg, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_TRAINING_PTN_SET);
>> }
>> +
>> +void analogix_dp_enable_psr_crc(struct analogix_dp_device *dp)
>> +{
>> + writel(PSR_VID_CRC_FLUSH | PSR_VID_CRC_ENABLE,
>> + dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_CRC_CON);
>> +
>> + usleep_range(10, 20);
> Is this sleep arbitrary, or documented somewhere? Could you add a
> comment explaining how this was arrived at?
>
Yes, this sleep is arbitrary, there is no document about the
>> +
>> + writel(PSR_VID_CRC_ENABLE, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_CRC_CON);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp, int db1)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int val;
>> +
>> + /* don't send info frame */
>> + val = readl(dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PKT_SEND_CTL);
>> + val &= ~IF_EN;
>> + writel(val, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PKT_SEND_CTL);
>> +
>> + /* configure single frame update mode */
>> + writel(0x3, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PSR_FRAME_UPDATE_CTRL);
>> +
>> + /* configure VSC HB0 ~ HB3 */
>> + writel(0x00, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_SPD_HB0);
>> + writel(0x07, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_SPD_HB1);
>> + writel(0x02, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_SPD_HB2);
>> + writel(0x08, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_SPD_HB3);
>> +
>> + /* configure VSC HB0 ~ HB3 */
>> + writel(0x00, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_SPD_PB0);
>> + writel(0x16, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_SPD_PB1);
>> + writel(0xCE, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_SPD_PB2);
>> + writel(0x5D, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_SPD_PB3);
>> +
>> + /* configure DB0 / DB1 values */
>> + writel(0x00, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_VSC_SHADOW_DB0);
> Lots of hardcoded values here. I think this could be cleaned up.
For "HB0~HB3", "PB0~PB3" and "DB1", I don't understand very well. Those
seems to be a kind of head number, I got those magic values from our IC
side. So I think those should be okay to keep the hardcode values here :-D
But for the "0x3" in "ANALOGIX_DP_PSR_FRAME_UPDATE_CTRL", I would fix it
with suitable macro.
>> + writel(db1, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_VSC_SHADOW_DB1);
>> +
>> + /* set reuse spd inforframe */
>> + val = readl(dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_VIDEO_CTL_3);
>> + val |= REUSE_SPD_EN;
>> + writel(val, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_VIDEO_CTL_3);
>> +
>> + /* mark info frame update */
>> + val = readl(dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PKT_SEND_CTL);
>> + val = (val | IF_UP) & ~IF_EN;
>> + writel(val, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PKT_SEND_CTL);
>> +
>> + /* send info frame */
>> + val = readl(dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PKT_SEND_CTL);
>> + val |= IF_EN;
>> + writel(val, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PKT_SEND_CTL);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.h
>> index cdcc6c5..a2698e4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.h
>> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
>> #define ANALOGIX_DP_VIDEO_CTL_8 0x3C
>> #define ANALOGIX_DP_VIDEO_CTL_10 0x44
>>
>> +#define ANALOGIX_DP_SPDIF_AUDIO_CTL_0 0xD8
>> +
>> #define ANALOGIX_DP_PLL_REG_1 0xfc
>> #define ANALOGIX_DP_PLL_REG_2 0x9e4
>> #define ANALOGIX_DP_PLL_REG_3 0x9e8
>> @@ -30,6 +32,21 @@
>>
>> #define ANALOGIX_DP_PD 0x12c
>>
>> +#define ANALOGIX_DP_IF_TYPE 0x244
>> +#define ANALOGIX_DP_IF_PKT_DB1 0x254
>> +#define ANALOGIX_DP_IF_PKT_DB2 0x258
>> +#define ANALOGIX_DP_SPD_HB0 0x2F8
>> +#define ANALOGIX_DP_SPD_HB1 0x2FC
>> +#define ANALOGIX_DP_SPD_HB2 0x300
>> +#define ANALOGIX_DP_SPD_HB3 0x304
>> +#define ANALOGIX_DP_SPD_PB0 0x308
>> +#define ANALOGIX_DP_SPD_PB1 0x30C
>> +#define ANALOGIX_DP_SPD_PB2 0x310
>> +#define ANALOGIX_DP_SPD_PB3 0x314
>> +#define ANALOGIX_DP_PSR_FRAME_UPDATE_CTRL 0x318
>> +#define ANALOGIX_DP_VSC_SHADOW_DB0 0x31C
>> +#define ANALOGIX_DP_VSC_SHADOW_DB1 0x320
>> +
>> #define ANALOGIX_DP_LANE_MAP 0x35C
>>
>> #define ANALOGIX_DP_ANALOG_CTL_1 0x370
>> @@ -103,6 +120,8 @@
>>
>> #define ANALOGIX_DP_SOC_GENERAL_CTL 0x800
>>
>> +#define ANALOGIX_DP_CRC_CON 0x890
>> +
>> /* ANALOGIX_DP_TX_SW_RESET */
>> #define RESET_DP_TX (0x1 << 0)
>>
>> @@ -151,6 +170,7 @@
>> #define VID_CHK_UPDATE_TYPE_SHIFT (4)
>> #define VID_CHK_UPDATE_TYPE_1 (0x1 << 4)
>> #define VID_CHK_UPDATE_TYPE_0 (0x0 << 4)
>> +#define REUSE_SPD_EN (0x1 << 3)
>>
>> /* ANALOGIX_DP_VIDEO_CTL_8 */
>> #define VID_HRES_TH(x) (((x) & 0xf) << 4)
>> @@ -376,4 +396,12 @@
>> #define VIDEO_MODE_SLAVE_MODE (0x1 << 0)
>> #define VIDEO_MODE_MASTER_MODE (0x0 << 0)
>>
>> +/* ANALOGIX_DP_PKT_SEND_CTL */
>> +#define IF_UP (0x1 << 4)
>> +#define IF_EN (0x1 << 0)
>> +
>> +/* ANALOGIX_DP_CRC_CON */
>> +#define PSR_VID_CRC_FLUSH (0x1 << 2)
>> +#define PSR_VID_CRC_ENABLE (0x1 << 0)
>> +
>> #endif /* _ANALOGIX_DP_REG_H */
>> diff --git a/include/drm/bridge/analogix_dp.h b/include/drm/bridge/analogix_dp.h
>> index 261b86d..183a336 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/bridge/analogix_dp.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/bridge/analogix_dp.h
>> @@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ struct analogix_dp_plat_data {
>> struct drm_connector *);
>> };
>>
>> +int analogix_dp_active_psr(struct device *dev);
>> +int analogix_dp_inactive_psr(struct device *dev);
> Why active/inactive instead of enable/disable, which is used everywhere else?
Done
Thanks,
- Yakir
>> +
>> int analogix_dp_resume(struct device *dev);
>> int analogix_dp_suspend(struct device *dev);
>>
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists