lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 8 Jul 2016 10:55:58 -0700
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>
Cc:	Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Lv Zheng <zetalog@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Bastien Nocera:" <hadess@...ess.net>,
	linux-input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] ACPI / button: Add SW_ACPI_LID for new usage model

On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 11:27:23AM +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com> wrote:
> > There are many AML tables reporting wrong initial lid state, and some of
> > them never reports lid state. As a proxy layer acting between, ACPI button
> > driver is not able to handle all such cases, but need to re-define the
> > usage model of the ACPI lid. That is:
> > 1. It's initial state is not reliable;
> > 2. There may not be open event;
> > 3. Userspace should only take action against the close event which is
> >    reliable, always sent after a real lid close.
> > This patch adds a new input key event so that new userspace programs can
> > use it to handle this usage model correctly. And in the meanwhile, no old
> > programs will be broken by the userspace changes.
> >
> > Link: https://lkml.org/2016/3/7/460

Does not work for me.

> > Link: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/2087

Gives me info about pull "Basic DNSSEC support, and unrelated fixes"

> > Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
> > Cc: Bastien Nocera: <hadess@...ess.net>
> > Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>
> > Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/button.c                  |   20 ++++++++++++++------
> >  include/linux/mod_devicetable.h        |    2 +-
> >  include/uapi/linux/input-event-codes.h |    3 ++-
> >  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/button.c b/drivers/acpi/button.c
> > index 148f4e5..4ef94d2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/button.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/button.c
> > @@ -130,7 +130,8 @@ static int acpi_lid_evaluate_state(struct acpi_device *device)
> >         return lid_state ? 1 : 0;
> >  }
> >
> > -static int acpi_lid_notify_state(struct acpi_device *device, int state)
> > +static int acpi_lid_notify_state(struct acpi_device *device,
> > +                                int state, bool notify_acpi)
> >  {
> >         struct acpi_button *button = acpi_driver_data(device);
> >         int ret;
> > @@ -138,6 +139,11 @@ static int acpi_lid_notify_state(struct acpi_device *device, int state)
> >         /* input layer checks if event is redundant */
> >         input_report_switch(button->input, SW_LID, !state);
> >         input_sync(button->input);
> > +       if (notify_acpi) {
> > +               input_report_switch(button->input,
> > +                                   SW_ACPI_LID, !state);
> > +               input_sync(button->input);
> 
> If you use a switch, you'll never send subsequent open state if you
> doesn't close it yourself.
> See my comments in 5/5 and please use a KEY event instead.
> 
> > +       }
> >
> >         if (state)
> >                 pm_wakeup_event(&device->dev, 0);
> > @@ -279,7 +285,8 @@ int acpi_lid_open(void)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_lid_open);
> >
> > -static int acpi_lid_update_state(struct acpi_device *device)
> > +static int acpi_lid_update_state(struct acpi_device *device,
> > +                                bool notify_acpi)
> >  {
> >         int state;
> >
> > @@ -287,17 +294,17 @@ static int acpi_lid_update_state(struct acpi_device *device)
> >         if (state < 0)
> >                 return state;
> >
> > -       return acpi_lid_notify_state(device, state);
> > +       return acpi_lid_notify_state(device, state, notify_acpi);
> >  }
> >
> >  static void acpi_lid_initialize_state(struct acpi_device *device)
> >  {
> >         switch (lid_init_state) {
> >         case ACPI_BUTTON_LID_INIT_OPEN:
> > -               (void)acpi_lid_notify_state(device, 1);
> > +               (void)acpi_lid_notify_state(device, 1, false);
> >                 break;
> >         case ACPI_BUTTON_LID_INIT_METHOD:
> > -               (void)acpi_lid_update_state(device);
> > +               (void)acpi_lid_update_state(device, false);
> >                 break;
> >         case ACPI_BUTTON_LID_INIT_IGNORE:
> >         default:
> > @@ -317,7 +324,7 @@ static void acpi_button_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event)
> >         case ACPI_BUTTON_NOTIFY_STATUS:
> >                 input = button->input;
> >                 if (button->type == ACPI_BUTTON_TYPE_LID) {
> > -                       acpi_lid_update_state(device);
> > +                       acpi_lid_update_state(device, true);
> >                 } else {
> >                         int keycode;
> >
> > @@ -436,6 +443,7 @@ static int acpi_button_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> >
> >         case ACPI_BUTTON_TYPE_LID:
> >                 input_set_capability(input, EV_SW, SW_LID);
> > +               input_set_capability(input, EV_SW, SW_ACPI_LID);
> 
> Can't we export this new event only if the _LID function is not
> reliable? This could check for the module parameter lid_init_state and
> only enable it for ACPI_BUTTON_LID_INIT_OPEN.
> 
> I really hope we will be able to find a reliable way to determine
> whether or not the platform support reliable LID state. If not, there
> might be a need to have a db of reliable switch platforms. This can be
> set in the kernel or with a hwdb entry in userspace.
> 
> Cheers,
> Benjamin
> 
> >                 break;
> >         }
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
> > index 6e4c645..1014968 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
> > @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ struct pcmcia_device_id {
> >  #define INPUT_DEVICE_ID_LED_MAX                0x0f
> >  #define INPUT_DEVICE_ID_SND_MAX                0x07
> >  #define INPUT_DEVICE_ID_FF_MAX         0x7f
> > -#define INPUT_DEVICE_ID_SW_MAX         0x0f
> > +#define INPUT_DEVICE_ID_SW_MAX         0x10
> >
> >  #define INPUT_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_BUS      1
> >  #define INPUT_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_VENDOR   2
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/input-event-codes.h b/include/uapi/linux/input-event-codes.h
> > index 737fa32..81c344c 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/input-event-codes.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/input-event-codes.h
> > @@ -780,7 +780,8 @@
> >  #define SW_ROTATE_LOCK         0x0c  /* set = rotate locked/disabled */
> >  #define SW_LINEIN_INSERT       0x0d  /* set = inserted */
> >  #define SW_MUTE_DEVICE         0x0e  /* set = device disabled */
> > -#define SW_MAX                 0x0f
> > +#define SW_ACPI_LID            0x0f  /* set = lid shut */

0x0f is busy already.

> > +#define SW_MAX                 0x10
> >  #define SW_CNT                 (SW_MAX+1)
> >
> >  /*
> > --
> > 1.7.10
> >

-- 
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ