lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 22:13:20 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah.kh@...sung.com, patches@...nelci.org, stable@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.6 00/31] 4.6.4-stable review On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 09:45:30PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 07/06/2016 07:18 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > ----------------------- > > Note, I'm on vacation this week, so I only took a few "easy" patches for > > the stable trees, due to me not having much time to debug anything here, > > and because, well, I'm on vacation and supposed to be ignoring patches. > > So if you have marked patches for inclusion, or emailed asking for > > things to be included, and you don't see them here (which you almost > > certainly will not), just wait a week or so before panicking please. > > ----------------------- > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.6.4 release. > > There are 31 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sat Jul 9 01:15:40 UTC 2016. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.6.4-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.6.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions. Thanks for testing both of these and letting me know. greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists