lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:40:22 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] s390/smp: clean up a condition

I can never remember precedence rules.  Let's add some parenthesis so
this code is more clear.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
---
The original code is correct right?  We didn't intend to say:

	sclp_max = sclp.max_cores * (sclp_max ?: nr_cpu_ids);

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
index 5c8f7ca..35531fe 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
@@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ void __init smp_fill_possible_mask(void)
 
 	sclp_max = max(sclp.mtid, sclp.mtid_cp) + 1;
 	sclp_max = min(smp_max_threads, sclp_max);
-	sclp_max = sclp.max_cores * sclp_max ?: nr_cpu_ids;
+	sclp_max = (sclp.max_cores * sclp_max) ?: nr_cpu_ids;
 	possible = setup_possible_cpus ?: nr_cpu_ids;
 	possible = min(possible, sclp_max);
 	for (cpu = 0; cpu < possible && cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ