linux-kernel - [RFC][PATCH 1/2 v2] proc: Relax /proc/<tid>/timerslack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 Jul 2016 10:24:19 -0700
From:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Oren Laadan <orenl@...lrox.com>,
	Ruchi Kandoi <kandoiruchi@...gle.com>,
	Rom Lemarchand <romlem@...roid.com>,
	Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>, Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
	Nick Kralevich <nnk@...gle.com>,
	Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@...gle.com>,
	Elliott Hughes <enh@...gle.com>,
	Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 1/2 v2] proc: Relax /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns capability requirements

When an interface to allow a task to change another tasks
timerslack was first proposed, it was suggested that something
greater then CAP_SYS_NICE would be needed, as a task could be
delayed further then what normally could be done with nice
adjustments.

So CAP_SYS_PTRACE was adopted instead for what became the
/proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns interface. However, for Android (where
this feature originates), giving the system_server
CAP_SYS_PTRACE would allow it to observe and modify all tasks
memory. This is considered too high a privilege level for only
needing to change the timerslack.

After some discussion, it was realized that a CAP_SYS_NICE
process can set a task as SCHED_FIFO, so they could fork some
spinning processes and set them all SCHED_FIFO 99, in effect
delaying all other tasks for an infinite amount of time.

So as a CAP_SYS_NICE task can already cause trouble for other
tasks, using it as a required capability for accessing and
modifying /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns seems sufficient.

Thus, this patch loosens the capability requirements to
CAP_SYS_NICE and removes CAP_SYS_PTRACE, simplifying some
of the code flow as well.

This is technically an ABI change, but as the feature just
landed in 4.6, I suspect no one is yet using it.

Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Oren Laadan <orenl@...lrox.com>
Cc: Ruchi Kandoi <kandoiruchi@...gle.com>
Cc: Rom Lemarchand <romlem@...roid.com>
Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
Cc: Nick Kralevich <nnk@...gle.com>
Cc: Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@...gle.com>
Cc: Elliott Hughes <enh@...gle.com>
Cc: Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
---
v2: Removed CAP_SYS_PTRACE check and simplified code flow

 fs/proc/base.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index a11eb71..8f4f8d7 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -2277,19 +2277,19 @@ static ssize_t timerslack_ns_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
 	if (err < 0)
 		return err;
 
+	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_NICE))
+		return -EPERM;
+
 	p = get_proc_task(inode);
 	if (!p)
 		return -ESRCH;
 
-	if (ptrace_may_access(p, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_FSCREDS)) {
-		task_lock(p);
-		if (slack_ns == 0)
-			p->timer_slack_ns = p->default_timer_slack_ns;
-		else
-			p->timer_slack_ns = slack_ns;
-		task_unlock(p);
-	} else
-		count = -EPERM;
+	task_lock(p);
+	if (slack_ns == 0)
+		p->timer_slack_ns = p->default_timer_slack_ns;
+	else
+		p->timer_slack_ns = slack_ns;
+	task_unlock(p);
 
 	put_task_struct(p);
 
@@ -2300,22 +2300,21 @@ static int timerslack_ns_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 {
 	struct inode *inode = m->private;
 	struct task_struct *p;
-	int err =  0;
+
+	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_NICE))
+		return -EPERM;
 
 	p = get_proc_task(inode);
 	if (!p)
 		return -ESRCH;
 
-	if (ptrace_may_access(p, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_FSCREDS)) {
-		task_lock(p);
-		seq_printf(m, "%llu\n", p->timer_slack_ns);
-		task_unlock(p);
-	} else
-		err = -EPERM;
+	task_lock(p);
+	seq_printf(m, "%llu\n", p->timer_slack_ns);
+	task_unlock(p);
 
 	put_task_struct(p);
 
-	return err;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int timerslack_ns_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
-- 
1.9.1