linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm_tis_core: add optional max xfer size check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Jul 2016 20:25:17 -0700
From:	Andrey Pronin <apronin@...omium.org>
To:	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Cc:	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
	Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>,
	tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	groeck@...omium.org, smbarber@...omium.org, dianders@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm_tis_core: add optional max xfer size check

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 09:13:51PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 06:39:04PM -0700, Andrey Pronin wrote:
> 
> > +static inline u16 tpm_tis_max_xfer_size(struct tpm_tis_data *data)
> > +{
> > +	return data->phy_ops->max_xfer_size;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline bool tpm_tis_burstcnt_is_valid(struct tpm_tis_data *data,
> > +					     u16 burstcnt)
> > +{
> > +	return (tpm_tis_max_xfer_size(data) == 0)
> > +		|| (burstcnt <= tpm_tis_max_xfer_size(data));
> > +}
> 
> We don't need these accessors, just open code it in the one call
> site. That is more clear as the ==0 case is important to understand
> that the flow is correct.
> 
> BTW, I dodn't think || as the start of a line was cannonical kernel
> style.. Did checkpatch accept that?
> 
> Jason

You mean completely open code it inside get_burstcount()? Will do.
checkpatch.pl had no problems with it, but I can move it to the end
of the line, if it feels better.

Andrey