lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:53:10 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Shayan Pooya <shayan@...eve.org>
Cc:	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
	cgroups mailinglist <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: bug in memcg oom-killer results in a hung syscall in another
	process in the same cgroup

On 07/15, Shayan Pooya wrote:
>
> >> --- x/kernel/sched/core.c
> >> +++ x/kernel/sched/core.c
> >> @@ -2793,8 +2793,11 @@ asmlinkage __visible void schedule_tail(struct task_struct *prev)
> >>         balance_callback(rq);
> >>         preempt_enable();
> >>
> >> -       if (current->set_child_tid)
> >> +       if (current->set_child_tid) {
> >> +               mem_cgroup_oom_enable();
> >>                 put_user(task_pid_vnr(current), current->set_child_tid);
> >> +               mem_cgroup_oom_disable();
> >> +       }
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  /*
>
> I tried this patch and I still see the same stuck processes (assuming
> that's what you were curious about).

Of course. Because I am stupid. Firtsly, I forgot to include another
change in fault.c. And now I see that change was wrong anyway.

I'll try to make another debugging patch today later, but let me repeat
that it won't fix the real problem anyway.

Thanks, and sorry for wasting your time.

Oleg.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ