lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:48:03 +0000
From:	"Odzioba, Lukasz" <lukasz.odzioba@...el.com>
To:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	"boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
	"david.vrabel@...rix.com" <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: RE: Revert c5ad33184354260be6d05de57e46a5498692f6d6 "mm/swap.c:
 flush lru pvecs on compound page arrival" from stable tree?
 Was:[osstest-admin@...project.org: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 bisection]
 complete test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd]

On Monday, July 18, 2016 5:31 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> We found that your patch in the automated Xen test-case ends up
> OOMing the box when trying to install guests. This worked prior
> to your patch.
>
> See serial log:
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/97597/test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd/serial-pinot0.log
>
> Would it be OK to revert this patch from the stable trees?

I think it is ok to revert that, but the source of a problem may be somewhere else.
Is it the only problem with this patch, you see?
By stable trees do you mean just 4.1 or all stable trees?

Thanks,
Lukas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ