linux-kernel - [PATCH] x86/vdso: Error out if the vDSO isn't a valid DSO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Jul 2016 14:46:35 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:	x86@...nel.org
Cc:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/vdso: Error out if the vDSO isn't a valid DSO

Some distros has been playing with toolchain changes that can affect
the type of ELF objects built.  Occasionally, this goes wrong and
the vDSO ends up not being a DSO at all.  This causes the kernel to
end up broken in a surprisingly subtle way -- glibc apparently
silently ignores a vDSO that isn't a DSO, so everything works,
albeit slowly, until users try a different libc implementation.

Make the kernel build process a bit more robust: fail outright if
the vDSO isn't ET_DYN or is missing its PT_DYNAMIC segment.  I've
never seen this in an unmodified kernel.

See https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/23378

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso2c.h | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso2c.h b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso2c.h
index 63a03bb91497..4f741192846d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso2c.h
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso2c.h
@@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ static void BITSFUNC(go)(void *raw_addr, size_t raw_len,
 
 	ELF(Phdr) *pt = (ELF(Phdr) *)(raw_addr + GET_LE(&hdr->e_phoff));
 
+	if (hdr->e_type != ET_DYN)
+		fail("input is not a shared object\n");
+
 	/* Walk the segment table. */
 	for (i = 0; i < GET_LE(&hdr->e_phnum); i++) {
 		if (GET_LE(&pt[i].p_type) == PT_LOAD) {
@@ -49,6 +52,9 @@ static void BITSFUNC(go)(void *raw_addr, size_t raw_len,
 	if (stripped_len < load_size)
 		fail("stripped input is too short\n");
 
+	if (!dyn)
+		fail("input has no PT_DYNAMIC section -- your toolchain is buggy\n");
+
 	/* Walk the dynamic table */
 	for (i = 0; dyn + i < dyn_end &&
 		     GET_LE(&dyn[i].d_tag) != DT_NULL; i++) {
-- 
2.7.4