linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm: consider per-zone inactive ratio to deactivate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:08:24 +0100
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm: consider per-zone inactive ratio to deactivate

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 02:30:17PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > The problem is due to the active deactivation logic in inactive_list_is_low.
> > 
> > 	Node 0 active_anon:404412kB inactive_anon:409040kB
> > 
> > IOW, (inactive_anon of node * inactive_ratio > active_anon of node) due to
> > highmem anonymous stat so VM never deactivates normal zone's anonymous pages.
> > 
> > This patch is a modified version of Minchan's original solution but based
> > upon it. The problem with Minchan's patch is that it didn't take memcg
> > into account and any low zone with an imbalanced list could force a rotation.
> 
> Could you explan why we should consider memcg here?
> 

It already was and there is no good reason to ignore it if it's memcg
reclaim.

> > In this page, a zone-constrained global reclaim will rotate the list if
> 
>           patch,
> 

I'll fix it.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs