linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6] ARM: sun4i: spi: Allow transfers larger than FIFO size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Jul 2016 19:20:37 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Michael Weiser <michael.weiser@....de>
Cc:	Olliver Schinagl <oliver@...inagl.nl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
	dev@...ux-sunxi.org,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] ARM: sun4i: spi: Allow transfers larger than FIFO size

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 07:27:12PM +0200, Michael Weiser wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 05:31:53PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > > What is keeping the patch from being merged (i.e. into mainline)?
> > Someone needs to address whatever review comments there were on the last
> > version and submit it.

> That's my point: There don't seem to be any.

> v6 was resend with fixes to checkpatch niggles on v5:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-August/363073.html

I can't tell if that was even submitted, it's got a subject line of
"ARM: sun4i" so there's every chance that even if it was sent to me it
got deleted unread.  Whatever was going on it needs to be submited.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)