lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 25 Jul 2016 23:02:08 +0300
From:	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
To:	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
	"linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org" <linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] xtensa: Fix build error due to missing include file

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>>> On 07/24/2016 08:18 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Heads up: xtensa images build after this patch, but the image that
>>>>>> previously failed to build (generic_kc705_defconfig) doesn't boot,
>>>>>> at least not with qemu. I don't know if this is caused by 69d99e6c0d621f
>>>>>> or by some other patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems to be booting, but serial console is non-functional.
>>>>> With commit 69d99e6c0d621f ("xtensa: Remove unnecessary
>>>>> of_platform_populate
>>>>> with default match table") I see the following message during boot:
>>>>>
>>>>> [    6.375284] of_serial fd050020.serial: clk or clock-frequency not
>>>>> defined
>>>>>
>>>>> Reverting that commit fixes serial console for me.
>>>>> Any suggestions on what might go wrong?
>>>>
>>>> Probably the init order changed somehow and deferred probe is not
>>>> supported correctly.
>>>
>>> While the message is due to -EPROBE_DEFER (and there should really be no
>>> message
>>> in this case), I suspect that the underlying problem is that of_clk_init()
>>> is
>>> now called way too early, before the clock source is fully initialized.
>>> Specifically, the call now happens before the message "clocksource: Switched
>>> to clocksource ccount", which at least looks suspicious.
>>>
>>> If I move of_clk_init() back into xtensa_device_probe(), to be called as
>>> device_initcall(), everything is fine.
>>
>> The problem is in the way the main clock on xtfpga platform is set up:
>> it is done by updating corresponding OF node's clock-frequency attribute
>> and that must happen before the of_clk_init call.
>> Looks like it's time to create a clock provider for xtfpga boards, something
>> like the one attached.
>
> I don't think we should require a DT update to fix this. I think we
> should revert all but the removing of of_platform_populate line for
> now.

Fine with me too. Should I send the revert?

-- 
Thanks.
-- Max

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ