Date:	Fri, 29 Jul 2016 12:39:05 +0300
From:	Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@...el.com>
Cc:	Lyude <cpaul@...hat.com>, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/6] Finally fix watermarks

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 05:03:52PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> This is completely untested (and probably horribly broken/buggy), but
> here's a quick mockup of the general approach I was thinking for
> ensuring DDB & WM's can be updated together while ensuring the
> three-step pipe flushing process is honored:
> 
>         https://github.com/mattrope/kernel/commits/experimental/lyude_ddb
> 
> Basically the idea is to take note of what's happening to the pipe's DDB
> allocation (shrinking, growing, unchanged, etc.) during the atomic check
> phase;

Didn't look too closely, but I think you can't actually do that unless
you lock all the crtcs whenever the number of active pipes is goind to
change. Meaning we'd essentially be back to the one-big-modeset-lock
apporach, which will cause missed flips and whanot on the other pipes.

The alternative I think would consist of:
- make sure level 0 watermark never exceeds total_ddb_size/max_pipes,
  so that a modeset doesn't have to care about the wms for the other
  pipes not fitting in
- level 1+ watermarks would be checked against total_ddb_size
- protect the plane/pipe commit with the wm mutex whenever the wms
  need to be reprogrammed
- keep the flush_wm thing around for the case when ddb size does get
  changed, protect it with the wm lock
- when programming wms, we will first filter out any level that
  doesn't fit in with the current ddb size, and then program the
  rest in
- potentially introduce per-pipe wm locks if the one big lock looks
  like an issue, which it might if the flush_wm holds it all the way
  through

> then during the commit phase, we loop over the CRTC's three times
> instead of just once, but only operate on a subset of the CRTC's in each
> loop.  While operating on each CRTC, the plane, WM, and DDB all get
> programmed together and have a single flush for all three.
>
> 
> 
> 
> Matt
> 
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 01:34:36PM -0400, Lyude wrote:
> > Latest version of https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/26/290 . Resending the whole
> > thing to keep it in one place.
> > 
> > Lyude (5):
> >   drm/i915/skl: Add support for the SAGV, fix underrun hangs
> >   drm/i915/skl: Only flush pipes when we change the ddb allocation
> >   drm/i915/skl: Fix extra whitespace in skl_flush_wm_values()
> >   drm/i915/skl: Update plane watermarks atomically during plane updates
> >   drm/i915/skl: Always wait for pipes to update after a flush
> > 
> > Matt Roper (1):
> >   drm/i915/gen9: Only copy WM results for changed pipes to skl_hw
> > 
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h      |   3 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h      |   5 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |  24 ++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     |   4 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c      | 240 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c  |   2 +
> >  6 files changed, 255 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> > 
> > -- 
> > 2.7.4
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> -- 
> Matt Roper
> Graphics Software Engineer
> IoTG Platform Enabling & Development
> Intel Corporation
> (916) 356-2795

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC

Powered by blists - more mailing lists