linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] of: add J-Core SPI master bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:00:35 -0400
From:	Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To:	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] of: add J-Core SPI master bindings

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 03:58:38PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:19:25PM +0000, Rich Felker wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/spi/jcore,spi.txt          | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/jcore,spi.txt
> 
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>

Thanks. Since I switched to to using the clk framework rather than a
clock-frequency property (at Mark Brown's suggestion/request), I'll be
submitting one more version for your review.

After that, who should be responsible for upstreaming this and the
other binding patches? You, me, or the subsystem maintainers that the
drivers are going through?

Rich