linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/1] EDAC, sb_edac: Fix channel reporting on Knights Landing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:44:22 +0000
From:	"Chrzaniuk, Hubert" <hubert.chrzaniuk@...el.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC:	"Odzioba, Lukasz" <lukasz.odzioba@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
	"dougthompson@...ssion.com" <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
	"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	"Anaczkowski, Lukasz" <lukasz.anaczkowski@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] EDAC, sb_edac: Fix channel reporting on Knights
 Landing

On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 07:06:56AM +0000, Chrzaniuk, Hubert wrote:
>> The original patch has been prepared by Lukas, then I [Hubert] rebased 
>> it, added commentary and cleaned up the code. In the end, Lukas 
>> modified it a bit once again according to suggestions from Tony. My 
>> SOB is unnecessary here, it only makes it more confusing.

> So aspects like that can (and should!) be documented in the commit message in free text, before the SOB chain. Something like this, for
> example:
> "...
> Hubert:
>  - rebased to 4.8
>  - comments and code cleanup
> "
> You can send me just the exact free text you want in there as a reply to this message and I'll integrate it.

What you have suggested is simple and perfect, let’s leave it this way :) 

Hubert:
 - rebased to 4.8
 - comments and code cleanup

Thanks a lot.