lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 4 Aug 2016 21:57:59 +0800
From:	Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...org
Subject: Re: [lkp] [sched/fair]  e210bffd39: perf-stat.cpu-migrations -36.0%
 decrease

On 08/04, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 01:24:23PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>> 
>> FYI, we noticed perf-stat.cpu-migrations -36.0% decrease due to commit:
>> 
>> commit e210bffd39d01b649c94b820c28ff112673266dd ("sched/fair: Fix and optimize the fork() path")
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>> 
>> in testcase: unixbench
>> on test machine: 16 threads Broadwell-DE with 8G memory
>> with following parameters:
>> 
>> 	runtime: 300s
>> 	nr_task: 1
>> 	test: shell8
>> 	cpufreq_governor: performance
>> 
>> 
>
>Urgh, I so hate these reports. They're near useless :/
>
>It took me 3 readings to realize it was the unixbench testcase (why
>isn't that in the subject!?). But then I still haven't found the primary

Will add test name in subject in later performance reports.

>performance metric. Does the test improve, degrade or not change
>overall?
>
Sorry, I should have described it more clearly, the primary performance
metric of unixbench is not changed, while perf-stat.cpu-migrations has a
-36.0% decrease which should improve cache locality.

We'd expect such stats changes report would help the developer to
evaluate impacts of his patch, anyway, we'll make it more clear that
it's just a FYI report, not some regression report. 

Thanks,
Xiaolong

>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ