lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 21:59:02 -0500 From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: daniel@...earbox.net, peterz@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...nel.org, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com, paulus@...ba.org, kernel@...p.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, aravinda@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, ananth@...ibm.com, Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] perf/tracefs: Container-aware tracing support Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: > This RFC patch set supports filtering container specific events > when perf tool is executed inside a container. The patches apply > cleanly on v4.7.0-rc7 > > Changes from v1: > 1/3. Revived earlier approach[1] with cgroup namespace instead > of pid namespace > 2/3. New patch that adds instance support for uprobe events in > tracefs filesystem > 3/3. New patch that adds "newinstance" mount option for tracefs > filesystem "newinstace" ick no. I see no justification anywhere why the perf cgroup is not enough for this. Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists