[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 12:38:24 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/7] cpufreq / sched: Make schedutil access
utilization data directly
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 01:46:51AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, August 01, 2016 12:28:50 PM Steve Muckle wrote:
> > Can the DL policy be left as-is and discussed/modified in a separate
> > series?
>
> No problem with that as far as I'm concerned, but in that case it won't be
> a Peter's patch any more. :-)
No problem from my side though. I just did them together as an
illustration of the benefit etc.. Rip it up as you see fit ;-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists