[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 14:20:14 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Anderson <anderson@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Wang Shu <shuwang@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] introduce for_each_process_thread_{break,continue}()
helpers
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:26:09PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Not sure. I'd like to do something simple for the start. We need to make
> show_state_filter() "preemptible" in any case. And even killable, I think.
> Not only it can trivially trigger the soft-lockups (at least), it can simply
> never finish.
Yeah, no objection raelly. Just make sure to put a comment explaining
the limitation/issues with whatever you descide to go for.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists