[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 15:03:43 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Nikolay Borisov <kernel@...p.com>,
"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
andi@...stfloor.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: Strange behavior of perf top with PEBS
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:23:20PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:30:32PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 08/04/2016 06:29 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 02:30:46PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> > [SNIP]
> > >
> > > sorry for late response..
> > >
> > > I checked on f22 kernel and it's missing the core2 PEBs fix:
> > > 1424a09a9e18 perf/x86: fix PEBS issues on Intel Atom/Core2
> > >
> > > which was introduced in 4.5.. you should upgrade or include
> > > this patch
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for the reply. Isn't this supposed to be tagged as stable since
> > it essentially breaks the default invocation of perf top?
>
> yep, it seems like good one to have in stable, Peter?
Greg, could you pick:
1424a09a9e18 ("perf/x86: fix PEBS issues on Intel Atom/Core2")
Into 4.4-stable ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists