[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 21:11:08 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 33/68] pinctrl: imx: Do not treat a PIN without MUX register as an error
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>
commit ba562d5e54fd3136bfea0457add3675850247774 upstream.
Some PINs do not have a MUX register, it is not an error.
It is necessary to allow the continuation of the PINs configuration,
otherwise the whole PIN-group will be configured incorrectly.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.c
@@ -207,9 +207,9 @@ static int imx_pmx_set(struct pinctrl_de
pin_reg = &info->pin_regs[pin_id];
if (pin_reg->mux_reg == -1) {
- dev_err(ipctl->dev, "Pin(%s) does not support mux function\n",
+ dev_dbg(ipctl->dev, "Pin(%s) does not support mux function\n",
info->pins[pin_id].name);
- return -EINVAL;
+ continue;
}
if (info->flags & SHARE_MUX_CONF_REG) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists