linux-kernel - Re: [PACTH v1] mm, proc: Implement /proc/<pid>/totmaps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Aug 2016 12:24:01 -0400
From:	Robert Foss <robert.foss@...labora.com>
To:	Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>
Cc:	Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	keescook@...omium.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	gorcunov@...nvz.org, john.stultz@...aro.org,
	plaguedbypenguins@...il.com, mguzik@...hat.com,
	adobriyan@...il.com, jdanis@...gle.com, calvinowens@...com,
	mhocko@...e.com, koct9i@...il.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
	n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
	ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ben Zhang <benzh@...omium.org>,
	Bryan Freed <bfreed@...omium.org>,
	Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PACTH v1] mm, proc: Implement /proc/<pid>/totmaps



On 2016-08-10 11:02 AM, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:16:45AM -0400, Robert Foss wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2016-08-09 06:30 PM, Jann Horn wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:01:44PM -0400, Robert Foss wrote:
>>>> On 2016-08-09 03:24 PM, Jann Horn wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 12:05:43PM -0400, robert.foss@...labora.com wrote:
>>>>>> +	down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>>>>>> +	hold_task_mempolicy(priv);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	for (vma = mm->mmap; vma != priv->tail_vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
>>>>>> +		struct mem_size_stats mss;
>>>>>> +		struct mm_walk smaps_walk = {
>>>>>> +			.pmd_entry = smaps_pte_range,
>>>>>> +			.mm = vma->vm_mm,
>>>>>> +			.private = &mss,
>>>>>> +		};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +		if (vma->vm_mm && !is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)) {
>>>>>> +			memset(&mss, 0, sizeof(mss));
>>>>>> +			walk_page_vma(vma, &smaps_walk);
>>>>>> +			add_smaps_sum(&mss, mss_sum);
>>>>>> +		}
>>>>>> +	}
>>>>>
>>>>> Errrr... what? You accumulate values from mem_size_stats items into a
>>>>> struct mss_sum that is associated with the struct file? So when you
>>>>> read the file the second time, you get the old values plus the new ones?
>>>>> And when you read the file in parallel, you get inconsistent values?
>>>>>
>>>>> For most files in procfs, the behavior is that you can just call
>>>>> pread(fd, buf, sizeof(buf), 0) on the same fd again and again, giving
>>>>> you the current values every time, without mutating state. I strongly
>>>>> recommend that you get rid of priv->mss and just accumulate the state
>>>>> in a local variable (maybe one on the stack).
>>>>
>>>> So a simple "static struct mem_size_stats" in totmaps_proc_show() would be a
>>>> better solution?
>>>
>>> Er, why "static"? Are you trying to create shared state between different
>>> readers for some reason?
>>>
>>
>> I think I'm a bit confused now, how are you suggesting that I replace
>> priv->mss?
>
> Like this:
>
> static int totmaps_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> {
>         struct proc_maps_private *priv = m->private;
>         struct mm_struct *mm;
>         struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>         struct mem_size_stats mss_sum;
>
>         memset(&mss_sum, 0, sizeof(mss_sum));
>
>         [...]
>
>         for (vma = mm->mmap; vma != priv->tail_vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
>                 struct mem_size_stats mss;
>                 struct mm_walk smaps_walk = {
>                         .pmd_entry = smaps_pte_range,
>                         .mm = vma->vm_mm,
>                         .private = &mss,
>                 };
>
>                 if (vma->vm_mm && !is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)) {
>                         memset(&mss, 0, sizeof(mss));
>                         walk_page_vma(vma, &smaps_walk);
>                         add_smaps_sum(&mss, &mss_sum);
>                 }
>         }
>         seq_printf(m,
>                    "Rss:            %8lu kB\n"
>                    "Pss:            %8lu kB\n"
>                    "Shared_Clean:   %8lu kB\n"
>                    [...],
>                    mss_sum.resident >> 10,
>                    (unsigned long)(mss_sum.pss >> (10 + PSS_SHIFT)),
>                    mss_sum.shared_clean  >> 10,
>                    [...]);
>         [...]
> }
>


Thanks Jann for being really clear about this stuff. It is much appreciated!