linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] clk: Combine DT binding doc for max77686 and max77802

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:10:29 +0530
From:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To:	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	<sboyd@...eaurora.org>
CC:	<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] clk: Combine DT binding doc for max77686 and max77802

Hi,

On Tuesday 28 June 2016 04:58 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Tuesday 21 June 2016 12:16 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>
>> On Monday 20 June 2016 10:09 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 04:21:05PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +
>>>>   Following properties should be presend in main device node of the 
>>>> MFD chip.
>>>>     Required properties:
>>> I'd expect to see compatible strings updated...
>>>
>>
>> There is no separate compatible string for clock. The clock nodes is 
>> the parent node only and the compatible described in the parent DT 
>> binding doc.
>>
>>
>> Do we also need to add same thing here?
>
> Are you fine with the above? As there is no compatible string for 
> clock (clock does not have separate node), do I still need to add 
> explicitly here?
>


Can you please help here to review? If required, I can rebase and 
re-send the patches.


Thanks,
Laxman