linux-kernel - Re: [tip:smp/hotplug] cpu/hotplug: Prevent alloc/free of irq descriptors during CPU up/down (again)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 11 Aug 2016 10:30:57 -0400
From:	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, jgross@...e.com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
	peterz@...radead.org, anna-maria@...utronix.de,
	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:smp/hotplug] cpu/hotplug: Prevent alloc/free of irq
 descriptors during CPU up/down (again)

On 08/11/2016 10:17 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2016-08-11 10:11:20 [-0400], Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> Are you asking why this is not using new hotplug infrastructure?
> correct.
> 
>> This should indeed be done but not as part of this series. Here we are
>> solving a specific problem and part of this is allowing PV guests use
>> the same notifier that HVM guests already do.
> 
> I have a huge a series (1285 patches to be exact) which converts the
> remaining users away and you are adding new ones.


So you must have converted Xen code already then? Can you post those
patches (not all 1285, just Xen-related, assuming there are no
dependencies) and I'll see if I can add them to this series?


> Is this patch of yours going stable?

No.

-boris