linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.16 048/305] ext4: fix oops on corrupted filesystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 13 Aug 2016 18:42:51 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Jan Kara" <jack@...e.cz>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
	"Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 048/305] ext4: fix oops on corrupted filesystem

3.16.37-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

commit 74177f55b70e2f2be770dd28684dd6d17106a4ba upstream.

When filesystem is corrupted in the right way, it can happen
ext4_mark_iloc_dirty() in ext4_orphan_add() returns error and we
subsequently remove inode from the in-memory orphan list. However this
deletion is done with list_del(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_orphan) and thus we
leave i_orphan list_head with a stale content. Later we can look at this
content causing list corruption, oops, or other issues. The reported
trace looked like:

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 46 at lib/list_debug.c:53 __list_del_entry+0x6b/0x100()
list_del corruption, 0000000061c1d6e0->next is LIST_POISON1
0000000000100100)
CPU: 0 PID: 46 Comm: ext4.exe Not tainted 4.1.0-rc4+ #250
Stack:
 60462947 62219960 602ede24 62219960
 602ede24 603ca293 622198f0 602f02eb
 62219950 6002c12c 62219900 601b4d6b
Call Trace:
 [<6005769c>] ? vprintk_emit+0x2dc/0x5c0
 [<602ede24>] ? printk+0x0/0x94
 [<600190bc>] show_stack+0xdc/0x1a0
 [<602ede24>] ? printk+0x0/0x94
 [<602ede24>] ? printk+0x0/0x94
 [<602f02eb>] dump_stack+0x2a/0x2c
 [<6002c12c>] warn_slowpath_common+0x9c/0xf0
 [<601b4d6b>] ? __list_del_entry+0x6b/0x100
 [<6002c254>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x94/0xa0
 [<602f4d09>] ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x239/0x3a0
 [<6002c1c0>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x0/0xa0
 [<60023ebf>] ? set_signals+0x3f/0x50
 [<600a205a>] ? kmem_cache_free+0x10a/0x180
 [<602f4e88>] ? mutex_lock+0x18/0x30
 [<601b4d6b>] __list_del_entry+0x6b/0x100
 [<601177ec>] ext4_orphan_del+0x22c/0x2f0
 [<6012f27c>] ? __ext4_journal_start_sb+0x2c/0xa0
 [<6010b973>] ? ext4_truncate+0x383/0x390
 [<6010bc8b>] ext4_write_begin+0x30b/0x4b0
 [<6001bb50>] ? copy_from_user+0x0/0xb0
 [<601aa840>] ? iov_iter_fault_in_readable+0xa0/0xc0
 [<60072c4f>] generic_perform_write+0xaf/0x1e0
 [<600c4166>] ? file_update_time+0x46/0x110
 [<60072f0f>] __generic_file_write_iter+0x18f/0x1b0
 [<6010030f>] ext4_file_write_iter+0x15f/0x470
 [<60094e10>] ? unlink_file_vma+0x0/0x70
 [<6009b180>] ? unlink_anon_vmas+0x0/0x260
 [<6008f169>] ? free_pgtables+0xb9/0x100
 [<600a6030>] __vfs_write+0xb0/0x130
 [<600a61d5>] vfs_write+0xa5/0x170
 [<600a63d6>] SyS_write+0x56/0xe0
 [<6029fcb0>] ? __libc_waitpid+0x0/0xa0
 [<6001b698>] handle_syscall+0x68/0x90
 [<6002633d>] userspace+0x4fd/0x600
 [<6002274f>] ? save_registers+0x1f/0x40
 [<60028bd7>] ? arch_prctl+0x177/0x1b0
 [<60017bd5>] fork_handler+0x85/0x90

Fix the problem by using list_del_init() as we always should with
i_orphan list.

Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 fs/ext4/namei.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
@@ -2626,7 +2626,7 @@ int ext4_orphan_add(handle_t *handle, st
 			 * list entries can cause panics at unmount time.
 			 */
 			mutex_lock(&sbi->s_orphan_lock);
-			list_del(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_orphan);
+			list_del_init(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_orphan);
 			mutex_unlock(&sbi->s_orphan_lock);
 		}
 	}