| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 18:06:53 +0200 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jamespharvey20@...il.com, regressions@...mhuis.info Cc: hdegoede@...hat.com, tj@...nel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, oliver@...kum.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu Subject: Re: Regression - SATA disks behind USB ones on v4.8-rc1, breaking boot. [Re: Who reordered my disks (probably v4.8-rc1 problem)] On Sun 2016-08-14 12:14:38, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Sun 2016-08-14 11:20:44, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > It seems that in v4.8-rc0, /dev/sdX got reordered, and now USB devices > > > are probed before SATA drivers. That is pretty anti-social. It > > > broke my boot on my primary machine, and unfortunately due to BIOS > > > problems (keyboard does not work when connected through a hub) it is > > > less fun than it should be. > > > > If you know which commit caused the reordering, that would be helpful. > > > > v4.1 seems to be ok: SATA disk is sda, as expected. > > > > v4.4 seems to be ok: SATA disk is sda, as expected. > > v4.6 seems to be ok. v4.7-rc1 seems to be ok?! 9956d572 v4.7-rc3 seems still to be ok. v4.7-rc4: still ok. v4.7-rc5: ok. v4.7-rc6: problem Bisecting now, 8 steps to go. As it was introduced between -rc5 and -rc6, bisect should not be too scary. Best regards, Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists