lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 13 Aug 2016 18:42:51 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Meelis Roos" <mroos@...ux.ee>,
	"Jens Axboe" <axboe@...com>,
	"Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz" <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 084/305] blk-mq: fix undefined behaviour in
 order_to_size()

3.16.37-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>

commit b3a834b1596ac668df206aa2bb1f191c31f5f5e4 upstream.

When this_order variable in blk_mq_init_rq_map() becomes zero
the code incorrectly decrements the variable and passes the result
to order_to_size() helper causing undefined behaviour:

 UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in block/blk-mq.c:1459:27
 shift exponent 4294967295 is too large for 32-bit type 'unsigned int'
 CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.6.0-rc6-00072-g33656a1 #22

Fix the code by checking this_order variable for not having the zero
value first.

Reported-by: Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>
Fixes: 320ae51feed5 ("blk-mq: new multi-queue block IO queueing mechanism")
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 block/blk-mq.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1385,7 +1385,7 @@ static struct blk_mq_tags *blk_mq_init_r
 		int to_do;
 		void *p;
 
-		while (left < order_to_size(this_order - 1) && this_order)
+		while (this_order && left < order_to_size(this_order - 1))
 			this_order--;
 
 		do {

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ