linux-kernel - Re: [Documentation] State of CPU controller in cgroup v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Aug 2016 16:07:38 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [Documentation] State of CPU controller in cgroup v2

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 06:09:44PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:

> [ That, and a disturbing number of emotional outbursts against
>   systemd, which has nothing to do with any of this. ]

Oh, so I'm entirely dreaming this then:

  https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/3905

Completely unrelated.

Also, the argument there seems unfair at best, you don't need cpu-v2 for
buffered write control, you only need memcg and block co-mounted.