linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] XSA 154 and ISA region (640K -> 1MB) WB cache instead of UC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Aug 2016 05:12:54 -0600
From:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:	"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc:	<stefan.bader@...onical.com>, <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	"xen-devel" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
	"Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
	<chuck.anderson@...cle.com>, "Juergen Gross" <JGross@...e.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] XSA 154 and ISA region (640K -> 1MB) WB cache
 instead of UC

>>> On 18.08.16 at 12:16, <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com> wrote:
> On 18/08/16 11:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 17.08.16 at 22:32, <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
>>>    Looking at the kernel it assumes that WB is ok for 640KB->1MB.
>>>    The comment says:
>>>    " /* Low ISA region is always mapped WB in page table. No need to track 
> *"
>> As per above it's not clear to me what this comment is backed by.
> 
> This states what is in the pagetables.  Not the combined result with MTRRs.
> 
> WB in the pagetables and WC/UB in the MTRRs is a legal combination which
> functions correctly.

True, but then again - haven't I been told multiple times that Linux
nowadays prefers to run without using MTRRs?

Jan