linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 49/57] x86/unwind: warn on kernel stack corruption

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:06:29 -0500
From:	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
	Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 49/57] x86/unwind: warn on kernel stack corruption

Detect situations in the unwinder where the frame pointer refers to a
bad address, and print an appropriate warning.

Use printk_deferred_once() because the unwinder can be called with the
console lock by lockdep via save_stack_trace().

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c
index 2e729bf..65c5e416 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c
@@ -130,8 +130,17 @@ bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
 	}
 
 	/* make sure the next frame's data is accessible */
-	if (!update_stack_state(state, next_frame, next_len))
-		return false;
+	if (!update_stack_state(state, next_frame, next_len)) {
+		/*
+		 * Don't warn on bad regs->bp.  An interrupt in entry code
+		 * might cause a false positive warning.
+		 */
+		if (state->regs)
+			goto the_end;
+
+		goto bad_address;
+	}
+
 	/* move to the next frame */
 	if (regs) {
 		state->regs = regs;
@@ -143,6 +152,17 @@ bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
 
 	return true;
 
+bad_address:
+	if (state->regs)
+		printk_deferred_once(KERN_WARNING
+			"WARNING: kernel stack regs at %p in %s:%d has bad 'bp' value %p\n",
+			state->regs, state->task->comm,
+			state->task->pid, next_bp);
+	else
+		printk_deferred_once(KERN_WARNING
+			"WARNING: kernel stack frame pointer at %p in %s:%d has bad value %p\n",
+			state->bp, state->task->comm,
+			state->task->pid, next_bp);
 the_end:
 	state->stack_info.type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
 	return false;
-- 
2.7.4