lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 19 Aug 2016 07:45:00 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel@...inux.com, Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Linux PWM List <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 17/17] dt-bindings: pwm: sti: Update DT bindings with
 recent changes

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:35 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Rob Herring wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:35:08AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>> > We're renaming the 'st,pwm-num-chan' binding to 'st,pwm-num-devs' to
>> > be more inline with the naming conventions of the subsystem.  Where
>> > we used to treat each line as a channel, the PWM convention is to
>> > describe them as devices.
>>
>> This is out of date now. Otherwise, the binding looks fine.
>
> Yes, you are right.
>
> Perhaps if this is okay with Thierry, he can remove these few lines.
> If not, I don't mind re-sending on request.
>
> I'll leave it until I hear otherwise.

Fine with me.

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ