lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 22 Aug 2016 09:46:04 -0700
From:   "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Doug Thompson <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] skx_edac: Move a few hundred bytes to text from data
 using const

On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 05:02:41PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Marking arrays as const makes for smaller data.

Joe,

"a few hundred" seems to be exaggeration.

Before:
$ size drivers/edac/skx_edac.ko
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
   8435	   1024	     24	   9483	   250b	drivers/edac/skx_edac.ko

After:
$ size drivers/edac/skx_edac.ko
   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
   8531	    944	     24	   9499	   251b	drivers/edac/skx_edac.ko

so "data" was reduced by 80 bytes, but "text" went up by 96.

Net increase of 16 (perhaps because some padding for alignment???)

Making read-only data const is a good idea in general, but
do we want to do it if it *increases* kernel footprint?

-Tony

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ